Himjyoti Talukdar’s work signals a growing sophistication in Assamese cinema — a move away from exaggerated melodrama towards nuanced storytelling rooted in realism and emotional depth
In contemporary Indian cinema, family dramas often lean towards heightened emotions and familiar tropes, where moments of grief or joy are amplified to a level far removed from everyday experience. Assamese filmmaker Himjyoti Talukdar stands apart, crafting films that locate drama within life’s quieter corners, in moments marked not by melodrama but by subtleties of human emotion, relationships, and memory.
With his debut feature Calendar (2018) and his sophomore film Taarikh, Talukdar has begun shaping a body of work that speaks with restraint, authenticity, and an acute sensitivity to human fragility.
Calendar: Subtle Tragedy In Domestic Spaces
At its heart, Calendar is a tender exploration of the simple yet profoundly moving life of Hitesh Kakati (Arun Nath), a retired schoolteacher, and his wife, Manorama (Malaya Goswami), living in a small Assamese town.
Their world is unremarkable on the surface, marked by routines, small joys, and occasional frustrations. Yet Talukdar’s narrative reveals the emotional fissures that underlie this domestic calm, reflecting on familial conflicts, ageing, and the quiet anxieties of sustaining life and love.
What distinguishes Calendar is its refusal to embellish. The mise-en-scène adopts a minimalist framework, with small rooms, functional objects, and familiar sounds of everyday life allowing viewers to feel like silent participants within the household.
The recurring image of a scooter that refuses to start evokes not just the passage of time but also the sentimentality we attach to objects that once defined our daily existence.
Sound design plays a pivotal role in bringing the world alive. Announcements from mobile theatre groups, the rustling of bamboo during Magh Bihu, the faint strains of prayer from the namghar, or the muffled commotion of a drunken man falling off his bicycle — all of these exist largely off-screen, enriching the world without crowding the narrative.
As sound designer Debajit Gayan creates this auditory tapestry, Talukdar emphasises that life often happens beyond what we see, in the fleeting noises and rhythms that surround us.
Taarikh: A Meditation On Denial And Human Fragility
If Calendar was an exploration of small-town domesticity, Taarikh moves towards the urban and psychological, presenting a more meditative and internalised drama.
The film centres on Durlov Dutta (Arun Nath), a 70-year-old man unable to reconcile with the tragic death of his son in a 2008 bomb blast.
Rather than portraying him as a figure of overt grief, Talukdar envisions Durlov as a man caught in a ritualistic pattern of denial: writing applications to the Chief Minister, visiting the police station daily, and wandering the city streets in silent pursuit of a hope long extinguished.
Remarkably, Durlov does not utter a single line of dialogue throughout the film. His silence becomes the canvas on which the audience projects their empathy, heightening the poignancy of his condition.
Arun Nath’s restrained performance transforms gestures, glances, and stillness into emotional signifiers, revealing the depth of his unresolved anguish.
Taarikh also introduces a set of supporting characters who provide contrasting shades of human connection. Radha (Swagata Bharali) and her husband Basanta (Kula Kuldip), who care for Durlov without expectation of reward, embody compassion without sentimentality.
Anuran Hazarika (Boloram Das), a journalist investigating Durlov’s case, brings curiosity and determination, though his motivations feel underdeveloped at times — a point where the narrative misses an emotional beat. Nevertheless, these characters create a humane backdrop, emphasising the fundamental need for empathy and belonging.
Themes And Aesthetic Continuity
Across both Calendar and Taarikh, Talukdar demonstrates a consistent thematic and aesthetic vision. His films are not concerned with dramatic crescendos but with the subtler truths of human existence, such as ageing, grief, the weight of memory, and the search for connection.
The choice to render key scenes off-screen, to rely on soundscapes, and to embrace minimalism reflects a filmmaker who trusts his audience’s emotional intelligence.
While Calendar evokes the warmth and intimacy of small-town life, Taarikh shifts to a more introspective mode, presenting grief as a psychological state rather than a narrative event.
Yet both films share a sensitivity towards human vulnerability, portraying characters not as symbols or victims but as ordinary people navigating difficult emotional terrains.
A Voice For Contemporary Assamese Cinema
Himjyoti Talukdar’s work signals a growing sophistication in Assamese cinema — a move away from exaggerated melodrama towards nuanced storytelling rooted in realism and emotional depth.
By focusing on ordinary lives and understated conflicts, his films resonate universally while retaining their regional textures.
With only two features, Talukdar has already marked himself as a filmmaker of restraint, sensitivity, and precision.
His filmmaking suggests that the most profound stories often emerge not from heightened drama but from the silences, gestures, and memories that shape human lives.
ALSO READ | Taarikh Review: Himjyoti Talukdar’s Film Balances Pain And Hope After Tragedy; But Does It Deliver?
Dipankar Sarkar is a film critic who contributes to different publications- both national and international. He is a Research Fellowship from the NFAI, Pune, India, and was one of the panelists for the selection of world cinema at the 27th International Film Festival of Kerala in 2022.