As far as independent films go, the 97th Academy Awards might be remembered as a reflective move towards an uncompromising approach.

Sean Baker's Anora, a raucously raw, humane dramatization of a Brooklyn stripper, won Best Picture, and Brady Corbet's brooding masterpiece, The Brutalist, which, with its uncompromising vision, received three significant wins, among them Best Actor.

But as the evening went on, filled with warm acceptance speeches, the obligatory glamour of the stars would loom beneath a far more sobering story — an urgent contemplation of the hard economic reality that most independent filmmakers must face.

For all the accolades and artistic legitimacy, neither Baker nor Corbet earned enough to live in extravagant comfort.

Anora might present itself with the sheen of an Oscar- and Palme d'Or-winning feature, but its box-office earnings would never come close to that of the mainstream behemoths conveniently showing in multiplexes.

In Corbet’s The Brutalist, cinematography and production design lend the film a scale and richness that belie its low-budget origins. But it failed to become a money-spinner.

In this arena of independent filmmaking, creative achievement and monetary reward have long stood in stark contrast to each other.

History has shown that in Hollywood, success and recognition do not always translate into financial rewards. Despite winning awards and critical acclaim, filmmakers, especially those in independent cinema across the world, may still struggle to make money or secure future projects.

It remains to be seen whether major production houses will back Baker and Corbet’s future projects while granting them the same level of creative freedom.

The awards circuit, whether in Hollywood or the rest of the world, will continue to sell us a narrative of artistic triumph, but the truth is far more down to earth.

Independent filmmakers such as Baker, Corbet, and their ilk face an uphill battle—and often, they are losing—not only in getting their films made but also in staying financially afloat even when a movie succeeds.

Perhaps we should rethink our definition of success in filmmaking. Instead of measuring a filmmaker's "win" solely by awards and recognition, we should also consider financial stability, creative freedom, and long-term opportunities as indicators of true success.

As long as this industry fails to finance its most visionary voices, these recognitions will remain an empty yet promising celebration of artistry that masks the harsh cost of artistic integrity.

ALSO READ | WhatsApp Ventures Into Filmmaking Business