The Indo–Pakistan war of 1971 remains one of Hindi cinema’s most dependable narrative reservoirs. It offers filmmakers the reassurance of a decisive historical victory, a ready-made moral clarity, and an effective shorthand capable of stirring patriotic feeling with minimal resistance.

This inherited grammar of heroism—forged in adversity, sacrifice crowned by triumph—has proved not only ideologically convenient but commercially reliable.

Border 2, Anurag Singh’s stand-alone sequel to JP Dutta’s 1997 blockbuster, operates squarely within this tradition, opening with confidence and familiarity, content to rehearse established gestures without troubling itself to say anything substantially new.

Sriram Raghavan’s Ikkis, approaching the same war from an anti-war perspective, forfeits that advantage almost immediately. In doing so, it foregrounds a question that contemporary Hindi war films rarely confront with such clarity: whether authorship lies in the safety of affirmation or in the risk of interrogation.

Inspired by the life of Second Lieutenant Arun Khetarpal, who was posthumously awarded the Param Vir Chakra for his role in the Battle of Basantar, Ikkis resists the kinetic forward thrust typical of combat cinema.

Its narrative is framed by an act of return. Three decades after the war, Brigadier Madan Lal Khetarpal travels to Lahore for a college reunion, hosted by Jaan Mohammad Nisar, a former Pakistani army officer now working as a cricket selector.

Madan also intends to visit Sargodha, his ancestral home before Partition, and the terrain where his son died. The film moves between this present-day journey and Arun’s earlier passage from cadet to tank commander, gradually allowing the past to seep into the present not as triumphal memory but as unresolved residue.

Raghavan, best known for intricately engineered thrillers, shifts register here with notable restraint. The war itself is rarely fetishised; what occupies him instead are the peripheral details that quietly accumulate meaning.

A soldier at the front listens to radio songs requested by his wife. A fleeting reference to For Whom the Bell Tolls gestures towards an older literary tradition of war as moral attrition.

An elderly Pakistani man, suffering from Alzheimer’s, recalls a pre-Partition life in fragments, his fading memory evoking a time before borders hardened into destiny. These moments do not seek to overturn nationalist narratives outright, but they do erode their certainty.

The film’s portrait of Arun is similarly controlled. His cadet years are rendered with patient attention, shaping discipline into both ethics and identity.

Even his romance with Kiran functions less as emotional release than as confirmation of his singular focus; love is permitted only insofar as it does not distract from the vocation of soldiering.

When Arun reports a fellow cadet for breaking protocol—an act that briefly renders him a pariah—the moment is framed not as moral ambiguity but as proof of an unyielding internal code.

In this sense, Ikkis never entirely escapes the logic of exemplary masculinity that underwrites the genre. What it does instead is redirect attention away from victory towards consequence.

That redirection is most effective in the Lahore sections, where Nisar’s quiet unease subtly destabilises the film’s historical frame. He carries a guilt that resists easy articulation, and his presence reframes the past not as a closed chapter but as an open wound.

Even figures who might otherwise be reduced to caricature—the ISI agents tailing Madan and Nisar, a Pakistani soldier who lost his leg in the war—are granted a measure of interiority. Yet Raghavan’s restraint is also his limitation.

The climactic revelation Nisar offers Madan gestures towards moral reckoning without fully committing to it, approaching complexity only to pull back at the threshold.

A didactic end-credits disclaimer, conspicuously external to the film’s otherwise humane tone, briefly fractures its moral confidence, as though anxious to contain the implications it has raised.

Border 2, by contrast, has no such anxiety. It announces its intentions early and adheres to them with unwavering consistency. The film follows three cadets—representing the Army, Air Force, and Navy—under the supervision of Lt Col Fateh Singh, a role clearly calibrated to Sunny Deol’s enduring star persona.

Bonds of friendship are forged, families introduced, romances initiated, all in preparation for the inevitable call to arms. Midway through the film, a soldier learns of his daughter’s birth moments after discovering his comrade’s bereavement; he names the child after the dead mother.

Anurag Singh stages the scene with commendable restraint, allowing sentiment to register without tipping into melodrama. Similar care marks the domestic scenes involving Fateh Singh and his wife, which briefly recall the emotional grounding that distinguished Dutta’s original Border.

These moments, however, remain isolated. Gradually, the film yields to a familiar gravitational pull: the centripetal force of star-centric heroism. Fateh Singh is repeatedly positioned as a near-mythic saviour, his physicality and righteous fury recalling Deol’s recent action roles more than serving the ensemble drama the film initially promises.

The younger trio, ostensibly the film’s emotional core, are steadily marginalised, their relationships sketched rather than lived. Songs stand in for intimacy; time at the academy stretches without deepening character.

What might have become a multi-perspective war narrative settles instead into the well-worn contours of patriotic spectacle.

The contrast between Ikkis and Border 2 is instructive not because one succeeds where the other fails, but because together they map the narrow corridor within which Hindi war cinema continues to operate.

Border 2 exemplifies the comfort of repetition, drawing on nostalgia and rhetorical certainty to deliver a serviceable, emotionally legible product. Ikkis, for all its hesitations, attempts something rarer: to linger in the aftermath, where moral clarity dissolves and history refuses to remain obedient.

The risk it takes is not merely thematic but authorial. In choosing interrogation over affirmation, it relinquishes the easy satisfactions of the genre.

What remains unresolved, both within these films and beyond them, is whether mainstream Hindi cinema is willing to follow that risk to its logical conclusion.

The Indo–Pak war of 1971 will undoubtedly continue to return—as memory, as myth, as spectacle. The more pressing question is not how often it is revisited, but how honestly.

ALSO READ | 120 Bahadur: A War Drama That Trades Spectacle For Truth