Somewhere between the thunderous applause for Jawan (2023) and the anticipatory buzz around Jaat (2025), a shift has been quietly calcifying in the DNA of mainstream Hindi cinema.

Bollywood, long defined by its own regional eccentricities and commercial codes, is increasingly outsourcing its big-ticket spectacles to filmmakers from the South.

A common trait among these specially chosen directors is their flair for high-octane action and the orchestration of larger-than-life masculinity.

At first glance, this cross-pollination may seem a welcome diversification, a belated acknowledgement of the pan-Indian appeal that South Indian cinema has cultivated with both populist conviction and stylistic bravado.

Yet beneath the surface lies a more ambivalent story: one of creative outsourcing masquerading as innovation, and a national cinema caught in a crisis of identity.

The arrival of South Indian directors in Bollywood is not exactly new, but the scale and frequency seen in recent years signal something more systemic.

Filmmakers such as Atlee (Jawan), Kalees (Baby John, 2024), Rosshan Andrrews (Deva, 2025), and now Gopichand Malineni (Jaat) have been entrusted with revitalising the careers of male stars and injecting a kinetic charge into films otherwise weighed down by narrative inertia.

These directors bring a specific grammar of action cinema, their sensibilities forged in the maximalist traditions of South Indian blockbusters, where slow-motion hero entries and stylised violence are less a flourish than a narrative engine.

Thus, when they direct a Bollywood film, it is inevitable that this formula is executed with technical competence and fan-service precision. But it is precisely the success of such efforts that makes the trend worrisome.

The irony is rich. At a time when regional cinemas across India—Assamese, Malayalam, Marathi—are pushing boundaries in form and theme, Bollywood, once the country’s default cinematic trendsetter, is homogenising.

Many recent Hindi films' aesthetic and narrative textures now echo the stylised bombast of South Indian masala, without the cultural specificity or grounded emotionality that often make the originals resonate.

This is not a critique of South Indian cinema, which possesses its own richly layered traditions and tonal spectrum. Rather, it is a critique of Bollywood’s opportunistic mimicry and its hunger for easy formulas over aesthetic evolution.

The same tricks, the same narrative scaffolding, and a reluctance to depart from what once worked are warning signs. A borrowed formula is like an overused punchline: it can only work for so long before it begins to sound tired.

Moreover, the emphasis on resurrecting veteran stars in hypermasculine avatars often comes at the expense of compelling female characters, nuanced antagonists, and narrative surprise. The template also leaves little room for newcomers or quieter stories to breathe.

So, is this the beginning of a new, pan-Indian visual idiom, or merely a temporary fix, like a steroid shot to Bollywood’s bloated star system and sputtering storytelling machinery?

The answer may depend on whether these collaborations lead to deeper, more genuine creative exchanges, or remain exercises in pastiche and profit.

One hopes the industry remembers that formulas, by definition, are finite. Even in their enthusiasm for grand gestures and flying fists, audiences eventually crave stories that surprise, challenge, and move them.

Until then, Bollywood will keep borrowing the fire—and perhaps lose the spark that once made it burn.

ALSO READ | Bollywood Actor Rishi Kapoor Passes Away